Stormy Weather Forum

Lol. True say.

A key issue would be th dialectic In this Case it would appear to be "Conspiracy Theorist/Paranoids" Vs "The Skeptics" Group A will argue with Group B. Because ego gratification would appear to be more rewarding than begining the process of humbling oneself and stepping down, taking the hard lonely journey of self exploration and ego death/transformation/reshufle. I feel that a healing process could be nessessary before things get better. Would it be fair to say that the people who are labeled as the "Conspiracy Theorists" are imbalenced at the start and because of that they have found themselves, isocated, alienated and feeling rejected from society as a whole so they turned against it even BEFORE they found out about the conspiracies? and the main difference now is that they are aware of what a shity system it truely is, and so they can bury those initial problems they had and now have an excuse not to address that part of the inner because its "Their fault! Them the illmin-Elite-bankers-those-anyone but me"

I myself woke up to Spirituality and conspiracys and all the rest of it after panic attacks from weeks/months of drug abuse, so now I have the illminati to blame, does that mean Im off the hook and I dont need to look at myself? or does it mean that because of all the darkness im forced to look inwards even more?

I dont think we can fight fire with fire on this one, so we really have to transend the darkness or became part of it willingly or not

The best kept secret[e] is always in plain sight - and usually, we don't like to confront what we see there - hence, the continual external struggle that is really a manifestation of the inner struggle/denial/regression/pity/self-loathing...it is just a part of the process unfortunately...and where the last straw ends is where I am - pretty much in a state of cynicism and a seeming, "negative" attitude toward life (which is not what cynicism is about; it is about awareness, and realizing that we are all using a flawed, deceit based language system that ultimately makes everything not worth believing)

See this blog post.

It baffles me that you fail to see that this itself is a belief, and since it's not based on knowing, but has the added factor of insistence, it's really just an opinion: a conviction that makes you a convict: of your own belief that nothing is worth believing.

What you know is worth believing.

I think you are confusing awareness, with belief, conviction, and faith. They're not the same thing. Try not to intellectualize what I am saying (or, for that matter -what the Luciferian mind is thinking)

I don't believe you.

You never had to.

Such as the one that is exposing this "truth"?

One question is, who are you trying to convince of this "truth," and why?

It's a pretty tired old line to get so all-fired up about.